Nexus OS release 9.3 runs in 6 GB of RAM ( netlab system default). CSR 1000v cannot be used as a router-on-a-VLAN-trunk device. VLAN subinterfaces can be configured on Cisco CSR 1000v but do not work. Maximum interface bandwidth on IOS XRv is 1 Gbps (1000000).Ĭisco CSR 1000v does not support interface MTU lower than 1500 bytes or IP MTU higher than 1500 bytes. Vagrant configuration file uses fixed SSH password. Earlier releases might use a different management interface name, in which case you’ll have to set _if parameter to the name of the management interfaceĬopying Vagrant public insecure SSH key into IOS XR during the box building process is cumbersome. Netlab was tested with IOS XR release 7.4. limits it potential and simplicity.Cisco IOSv release 15.x does not support unnumbered interfaces. ZeroTier is super useful – but having one topology/scheme/etc for ZT+ARM, another for MIPS/etc. I'm just hoping they include MIPS+CHR ZeroTier, when they bump the package version. Exactly how ZeroTier is helpful for L2 winbox management today, just broader.
By keeping all the same sensors on the same ZT network offer all that all to just work, regardless of actual physical location. A lot of device also use some mDNS/SSDP/LLDP/DIAL/etc multicast discovery too. & the devices/sensors/etc may be physically separated. It's stuff like the KNOTs and wAP-LR8/9s that really would benefit from ZeroTier – but all are MIPSBE.Ī lot of the IoT cases are also when the uplink may be a CGNAT from LTE, starlink, etc. It's perfect to use with LORA / LORAWAN for large scale / low bandwidth sensor type deployments. That said, I see an enormous amount of value in enabling it on processor architectures other than ARM to enable IOT applications. That's not even getting into the OOB, Industrial/Energy and IoT applications. I don't know if they paid for it or not, but at the rate we are doing ZeroTier/MikroTik integrations to replace things like Cisco Anyconnect, Pulse Secure, Fortigate VPN, etc i would say it's worth it a thousand times over.
It's also better with IPv6 than almost everything else i've used. The flexibility and ease of using it are going to give MikroTIk a significant advantage in enterprise networks.
ZeroTier is the best overlay protocol MikroTik has ever added. So to me it looks like mutually beneficial cooperation, but definitely not overwhelmingly in MikroTik's favour, to justify paying for it. Surely some MikroTik customers appreciate it too, and that in turn is good for MikroTik if they can offer it. ZeroTier is running commercial service, more clients supporting it is good for them. I'm not following this closely, but did anyone from MikroTik ever in any way suggest or confirm that they are paying anything to ZeroTier for including it in RouterOS? Because it would seem weird.
0 kommentar(er)
